Progressive Maryland

Election Reform:  Public Campaign Funding

Senate President Miller Backs Campaign Finance Bill

Tell your reps, "Enact Campaign Finance Reform NOW!"

Senate President Miller joins Sen. Pinsky & PM's Weinstein
Maryland Senate President Mike Miller (center) announces his support for the bill at a news conference March 6. With Miller are bill sponsor Sen. Paul Pinsky (left), Progressive Maryland’s Matthew Weinstein, and Common Cause's Ryan O'Donnell (not shown).

 
Background

Power to the Voters, Not Special Interests!

Rallying demonstrators hold signs reading

To take power away from the special interests and return it to the voters in Maryland, we need a wide range of reforms: stronger enforcement of voting rights, modern and reliable voting equipment in all precincts, automatic or at least election-day voter registration, a “Democracy Day” holiday to boost turnout on election day, and other measures.

But we’ll never achieve these structural reforms as long as lawmakers feel more beholden to their big-money contributors than to the voters.  In every session of the General Assembly, developers, HMOs, banks, the energy industry, liquor wholesalers, the tobacco companies – thanks to tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions and lobbying fees – get the access to lawmakers that enables them to ram through their special interest agendas. These same corporate interests would surely thwart a comprehensive electoral reform package.

That’s why we need to introduce the reform that will strip the wealthy special interests of their best weapon: the ability to turn private money into political power. Public funding of campaigns makes it possible to pass laws to benefit all the voters, not just the HMOs, pharmaceutical companies, and other special interests that fund the campaigns of elected officials.

Public funding of campaigns is already law in Maine and Arizona, where it has worked well through four election cycles.  It is a proven, sensible way to change the status quo so that voters can take back control of politics and make elected officials accountable.  More than half of all candidates in Maine and Arizona -- incumbents and challengers, Democrats and Republicans -- use the system, with participation growing in each election. Connecticut enacted the reform in 2005, so has not yet used it in an election.

To push for public funding of campaigns, Progressive Maryland -- along with allies such as the NAACP, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, and Sierra Club -- enacted legislation in 2002 to create an official study commission to examine our state's campaign finance crisis and, if appropriate, recommend reforms.  That distinguished, bipartisan commission spent 18 months at its task, reviewing thousands of pages of research, hearing testimony from experts around the country, and commissioning a public opinion poll of Marylanders on the topic of campaign finance reform.  Its report makes an airtight case in favor of public funding of campaigns for General Assembly races.

In the 2006 session of the General Assembly, Sen. Paul Pinsky and Delegate Jon Cardin submitted reform legislation based on the study commission's recommendation, which passed the House of Delegates.  In 2007, we fell only one vote short of passing that bill through the Senate. Take 30 seconds to contact your representatives to tell them to support this legislation, which will reduce the power of the special interests and return government in Maryland fully to the people.

TAKE ACTION: PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LAWMAKERS NOW!

Learn More at the Links Above

 

PM Improves the Lives of Working Families in Maryland
Donate or Become a Member Now!

Get our alerts & newsletter
The Maryland Progressive
Subscribe at http://progressivemaryland.org/page.php?id=2212


 

 House Party
 

"The America over which FDR presided was home to mass organizations of the unemployed; farmers' groups that blocked foreclosures, sometimes at gunpoint; general strikes that shut down entire cities, and militant new unions that seized factories. Both communists and democratic socialists were enough of a presence in America to help shape these movements, generating so much street heat in so many congressional districts that Democrats were compelled to look leftward as they crafted their response to the Depression.

During Lyndon Johnson's presidency, the civil rights movement, among whose leaders were such avowed democratic socialists as Martin Luther King Jr. and James Farmer, provided a new generation of street heat that both compelled and abetted the president and Congress to enact fundamental reforms... In America, major liberal reforms require not just liberal governments, but autonomous, vibrant mass movements, usually led by activists who stand at or beyond liberalism's left fringe. No such movements were around during Carter and Clinton's presidencies... It might well be too little too late, but without left pressure from below, the Obama presidency will end up looking more like Carter's or Clinton's than Roosevelt's or Johnson's."

- Harold Meyerson, Wash. Post Jan. 8; Without a Movement, Progressives Can't Aid Obama's Agenda
 

Progressive Maryland staffers rally on the steps of the governor's mansion
PM's political strength comes from over 15,000 individual member-supporters and partnerships with 50 of Maryland's largest community, faith-based, labor, and civil rights groups. But we need your support to continue holding elected officials accountable so they respond to the needs of regular voters – not deep-pocket special interests.Donate or Become a Member Now!

 

USAction logo
Progressive Maryland's
national partner organization
 

2010 US Census: Do your part